 |
Digest of Decisions of the Court of Judicial Discipline
In re: Magisterial District Judge Maynard A. Hamilton – No. 2 JD 06
___ A.2d ___ (Pa.Ct.Jud.Disc. 2006)
Filed June 13, 2007
Order and Opinion, Panepinto, J.
Order of Sanctions filed July 27, 2007
Dissenting Statement, Musmanno, J.
Order filed August 3, 2007
The Judicial Conduct Board filed a complaint against Magisterial District Judge Maynard A. Hamilton alleging that Respondent punched an off-duty police officer at a golf club and then told the officer’s wife she could go pick him up off the floor. The Board alleged that this was conduct which brings the judicial office into disrepute, a violation of Article V, Section 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania Constitution, and the Board also alleged that this conduct was a violation of Rule 2(A) of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges.
The Court dismissed the Count alleging that Respondent’s conduct was a violation of Rule 2(A) of the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct of Magisterial District Judges.
The Court did conclude that Respondent’s conduct constituted conduct which brings the judicial office into disrepute, thus a violation of Article V, §18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. The Court held that Respondent was subject to discipline under Article V, Section 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania.
Following a sanction hearing, the Court (1) suspended Respondent from office for a period of nine (9) months without pay but provided that Respondent’s medical benefits were not to be affected during the suspension; and (2) placed Respondent on probation for one year following the suspension.
Full details of decision:
- Order (Per Curiam - June 13, 2007) - pdf
- Opinion (Panepinto, J. - June 13, 2007) - pdf
- Sanction Order (Per Curiam - July 27, 2007) - pdf
- Order (Per Curiam - August 3, 2007) - pdf
View all decisions
View all decisions with Summaries
NOTE: Information and Opinions returned by this system are not official. Certified and correct copies can be obtained from the Clerk of Court only. Furthermore, electronic opinion files may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official printed documents. Because of the conversions required to post opinions to this site, it is possible that the page numbers will not always conform to the original pages. If you wish to cite to a particular page of an opinion, it is suggested that you either obtain an original copy of that opinion from the Clerk of Court before doing so or note in your citation that you are citing from the website.
A production of Nexario Solutions, an Anchor Consulting Synergy.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Anchor Consulting in conjunction with The Court of Judicial Discipline, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved.
|