 |
Digest of Decisions of the Court of Judicial Discipline
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COURT OF JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE
 |
 |
 |
 |
| IN RE: |
 |
|
: |
|
 |
Edward E. Hartman |
: |
No. 5 JD 04 |
 |
Magisterial District Judge In and For |
: |
|
 |
Magisterial District 31-3-01 |
: |
|
 |
Lehigh County |
: |
|
ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2005, based upon the Conclusions of Law, it is hereby ORDERED:
 |
That, pursuant to C.J.D.R.P. No. 503, the attached Opinion with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law be and it is hereby filed, and shall be served on the Judicial Conduct Board and upon the Respondent,
That, either party may file written objections to the Court’s Conclusions of Law within ten (10) days of this Order. Said objections shall include the basis therefor and shall be served on the opposing party,
That, in the event that such objections are filed, the Court shall determine whether to entertain oral argument upon the objections, and issue an Order setting a date for such oral argument, and
That, in the event objections are not filed, within the time set forth above, the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law shall become final, and this Court will issue an Order setting a date, pursuant to C.J.D.R.P. No. 504, for a hearing on the issue of sanctions.
|
PER CURIAM
View summary of this case
Full details of decision:
- Per Curiam Opinion Order (February 11, 2005)
- Opinion (O'Toole , J. - February 11, 2005)
- Per Curiam Sanction Order (May 18, 2005)
View all decisions
View all decisions with Summaries
A production of Nexario Solutions, an Anchor Consulting Synergy.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Anchor Consulting in conjunction with The Court of Judicial Discipline, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. All rights reserved.
|